inclusion

the camp I’m at is an ‘inclusive’ camp. Unlike an inclusive holiday, that doesn’t mean that you pay one fee for all the activities, it means that campers with educational or physical disabilities are mixed with those without.

This raises a couple of fairly interesting ideas, some of which I’m going to explore very briefly. This could be really boring.

Firstly - is inclusion a positive or a negative thing? And is it a real thing? In ‘real life’ you could argue that we practice inclusion, we don’t practice euthanasia on babies born with conditions that society deems ‘abnormal’ or ‘disabled’ and so we practice inclusion from the word go. But then we have special schools and special work places for people with both types of disability, we hospitalize and medicate them, we judge and exclude them.

Personally I think inclusion is a nonsense in that we should all be practicing it anyway. I was talking to the camp director today and I told her how I would demonstrate the futility of the idea of inclusion; get a bunch of Mr Potato Head dolls and instead of eyes and mouths, I’d have pins with ‘good a math’,’ blue eyes’, ‘great comedy timing’, ‘autism’ and ‘down syndrome’. The point being that fundamentally, we’re all Mr Potato Head dolls.

One thing that I don’t agree with is the idea that people have to be financially independent. I know that it’s the American dream and all but it’s fundamentally broken. If we’re fortunate, we need to share our fortune. I’m up for re-distribution of wealth, however I also am for Yachts. Life is full of contradictions.

It’s easy to say that the people who have a disability are the ones that benefit from inclusion but really, it’s the people without. Working and living in the kind of inclusion that is practiced here is really eye-opening. I keep saying that we’re all the same and that we just need to look after each other. Here they do just that, it’s pretty refreshing.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

That’s Mactastic!

So I’ve made a giant leap and said goodbye to my shaky old Dell Inspiron 1525 and purchased a brand new, shiny MacBook Pro. So just in case you were sick to death with switching to Mac stories, here’s another one.

There are a few reasons that I decided to buy one, which stems back to quite a few years ago. It was a time when Mark and I decided we’d try our hands at podcasting. You might not recall ever hearing such a thing, that’s probably because we never got it off the ground. In all fairness to my Dell it wasn’t designed to be a multimedia machine, it was just supposed to do the basic things very well and it did. However when I tried to get a bit creative we just fell on our arses. The soundboard wouldn’t recognise the microphones we bought and all the drivers I could find didn’t work.

It took about 2 hours to find that we’d have to use the installed microphone array, which created a lot of noise. When we managed to record a semi-decent podcast I had to edit with audacity. Now don’t get me wrong, for a free programme audacity is simply fantastic, it just crashes far too much to be reliable. Combine that with difficulty to meet up it was but on the backburner.

After that I was quite happy with my PC. Every now and again I’d look at the apple website and price up a realistic laptop for me to find that, no, I couldn’t afford it. However that all changed last easter when I found out that as a university student you get a discount on apple computers. I could get on board with that, but I still couldn’t afford it.

Cue just short of a year later when my PC, for the first time in its 18 month tenure, blue screened on me. A list of instructions came up and before I could finish reading “if this is the first time you have seen this message…” it turned itself off. “Not to worry” I told myself “this happens from time to time, I’ll just load it up and it will still work”. 30 minutes later I realised it wouldn’t work. After a summer of work I could have probably afforded a Mac then but that wasn’t the issue for me, the issue was fixing my PC.

One 500GB backup hard drive and a copy of Windows 7 later I had a working PC, and I was very pleased with Windows 7 and that hasn’t changed. Windows 7 is a great operating system, I’ve only had one problem with it since I installed it in March. I’d recommend an upgrade to anyone currently running Vista, you’ll be very pleased. So if I’m happy with my PC why did I shell out for a Mac? I’m glad you asked. It all happened with my first trip to an Apple Store a couple of weeks ago and my first talk with a “genius”.

I asked myself, “What is the most mind-numbing, pedestrian job conceivable?” and three answers came to mind: tollbooth attendant, Apple Store genius, and what Penny does. Now since I don’t like touching other people’s coins, and I refuse to contribute to the devaluation of the word “genius”, here I am.

Sheldon Cooper

Nice interlude there with something I agree with, Apple store sales assistants aren’t “geniuses” they’re just very good sales assistants. But then again when their competitors are the generally unhelpful staff at PC World then it’s a bit like Germany playing Australia1. However I digress and for the next bit of my tale to make sense you need a bit of a back-story. Quick version: I might be spending next year in Nice, Fance. Okay let’s continue. I was very apprehensive about taking a PC to a foreign country that had already broken once and showed no signs of not breaking again2. I don’t buy into the whole “Macs don’t crash” because I know for a fact that they do, so I was going on the whole “who will fix my computer easiest if it breaks”.

I only needed 2 pieces of information: 1. AppleCare Protection Plan is only £47 for students; 2. “AppleCare is international, even if you’re on a pacific island and can get access to a post office, we can fix your Mac”. That last little sound bite came from the “genius” I spoke to3. I told him I’d think about it so he gave me his card. I was hoping it would say “genius” on it but to no avail. Needless to say the next day I was walking through Leicester city centre crapping my pants that this wouldn’t be the first time I was mugged.

This morning I got Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. I wanted to use that of the iWork mainly because I think that Office 2007 is a great piece of software and didn’t see the need to change on that front. From the first look it scared the crap out of me. The tab style that you get in 2007 is gone and replaced with a photoshop style “formatting palette” and overall doesn’t look as good as 2007, which surprised me seeing as image is all for Apple. Maybe this was a dig by Microsoft. On second look I notice that you can do a lot more creative things with the 2008 suite, especially on powerpoint so I guess you win some and lose some.

I haven’t decided if I’m going to totally get rid of my PC. I don’t particularly want to, it works fine and I doubt that I’ll always use a Mac for the rest of my life, particularly when I start working. But until then…

Nick

  1. ohh, current events []
  2. it had that windows sign when I logged on, BAZINGA!! []
  3. I liked him, he looked a little bit like Frank Turner []
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

los films

on the plane over I watched three ‘flicks’. The Ghost1, Youth in Revolt, and Sherlock Holmes. In that order I’d give them five, five and seven out of ten.

I read the book that the Ghost Something is based on last week, it was good with a really strong build up to the final few chapters and then a really terrible ending. Really terrible. And cheesey. Just awful, in fact. A friend of mine said that the guy who wrote it, Robert Harris, writes his books so that they can be turned into screenplays very easily, I challenged that saying that the although the structure was there, a clear three acts, there was something missing. You know when you read a book whether it will make a film, I took a class on novel-to-screen adaptations last semester2 and there was this underlying feeling that when you read a good novel you can just tell, it has the Hollywood ‘x-factor’ if you will. You can feel it in films like 2010, one of my favorite adaptations, feel it in some of Stephen King’s work3, in more recent times, when I read Marley and Me you could tell that a cheap film version was going to be great, same with the story ‘Gun for the Devil’ that I adapted but in Ghost, it’s just not there.

A couple of minutes into the movie you can see what I mean, it’s the dialog that kills this film. It is wooden with a capital W an two capital D’s. Wait. The delivery of almost every single line is flat, especially Brosnan’s which at times is just laughable. His accent shifts so much too. It’s not just the lines that don’t work, the physical movement of the characters doesn’t work either. When the news first breaks from the ICC Kim Cattrall’s character moves the iMac screen about, resting it exactly where it was. It is laughable.

Pretty quickly I started trying to find someone to blame, Harris wrote the screenplay almost word for word with his novel, which is a fatal mistake because of the differences in the way you write the spoken word in a book and in a film, was it his fault? Who cast Ewan McGregor4, who at nearly forty still looks 23, far too young to be the voice of the book which they were bizarrely still going for. Cattrall as well, she sounds American the whole way through the second act. Dreadful. Maybe we should blame Polanski, that nut-job. Perhaps, I found myself thinking, he would turn up on set and give direction but it wouldn’t make sense, or it came out wrong, for example when he was trying to get his actors to show any trace of human emotion he would scream at them; “Make sure that you don’t show any emotion what-so-ever! Don’t smile! Deliver that line two seconds too early so it cuts off the important dialog in this scene! Again!”. I also wondered if McGregor introduced Polanski to his little girls. My guess is he didn’t5.

I didn’t really like Youth in Revolt. I felt that it didn’t achieve what it set out to be. Billed as ‘Indie’ by Virgin Atlantic the Dimension Films Cera vehicle tried to be laugh-out-loud and failed at every opportunity. I like Michael Cera, I liked him in Arrested Development and I’ll follow him through everything but this was a swing and a miss as far as I’m concerned. It was a bit of fun, fine but nothing did it for me. And that mustache! What? The action was too slow, there was not enough kissing and I didn’t get the plot, I don’t think the screenwriter got it either.

Lastly, Sherlock Holmes I liked. There was House in there, the chemistry between Holmes and Watson was awesome, the story, whilst a little crazy was really adventurous and kept you engaged and the action was just ‘top class’.

The only thing that was missing was the Holmes style; bring everyone into a room and go through the entire mystery, both catching the audience up and catching the bad guy in the process. There was a little scene when he explained the whole thing to Watson and that American girl I never got the name of but it was so short and there were only three of them there I don’t think it should have counted. Plus we knew from the opening scene who the bad guy was! In that respect it wasn’t a mystery, it was action.

The play between Jr. and Law was just brilliant, you wanted them on screen together constantly, that worked really well when Holmes left his gun lying around because we felt some of Watson’s desire to go after him. The sub-plots worked, the action was beautifully excessive and well designed and the piece was slickly directed by Guy Richie? Who’d have thought?

I’d watch it again in a second.

- Ben

  1. Writer - the credits called it ‘The Ghost’ but then the bit at the end said ‘The Ghost Writer []
  2. it was called ‘Adaptations’ []
  3. not all of it, mind []
  4. an actor I really like, who could be a time ranger one day []
  5. Is that too close to the bone? []
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

meta

recent posts

emily in Australia

we've got another friend in Australia! Click here to support Emily. Its good for you.

twitter

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter