What a folding HMV could mean

The HMV board announced today that it is calling in administrators and will most likely become the latest high street casualty. I’ve mentioned many times before on this site about my love of HMV and the ability to purchase hit films for less than a fiver, and I’ll be sad to see it go. I remember HMV being something really special. When I was given a CD as a present and it still had that black security sticker on it, I felt like a million pounds. This album had come from HMV!

I believe it survived where stores like Zavvi and Virgin Megastores didn’t because it offered something more than they did. It was a record store first and foremost whilst they became media outlets. It’s a subtle difference but it kept the chain afloat. That was until it started copying their business model. It seemed to lose its spark. It became just another high street store and I believe it failed because it abandoned the values that made it so great years ago. I also feel that these changes weren’t as a result of capitalist greed but capitalist survival, making its demise all the more disappointing. I don’t think I’m sad because it’s going – visiting HMV has become less and less of an enjoyable experience. No, I think I’m sad because it couldn’t survive at what it was good at.

As more and more media content is available through online stores such as amazon and play.com; download stores such as iTunes, amazon and the XBox and PS3 stores; and streaming services such as spotify((never understood how it’s survived for so long)), love film and netflix; HMV’s own effort was poor. It was never nice buying anything from the HMV website, it just felt clunky and awkward. One of the massive pluses of HMV was the ability to browse its shops, something that NO website has been able to recreate, and something that HMV needed to do and perhaps still so if they are going to survive as an online presence.

Hopefully this could spark a surge in artists become more independent. I like each and every artist who makes their music available to download straight from them (usually via a site like bandcamp) but these are few and far between. I know it’s difficult for someone to go well and truly independent. The backing of a record label provides a certain level of security and it’s probably easier to advance to the higher tiers of music fame and fortune with them.

For example when Biffy Clyro release their new album I’m going to have to buy it from iTunes or Amazon1, which will have bought the stock at a fixed price and added a mark up. Of that stock price a large percentage will go to the label to cover costs of recording space and time, pressing and printing etc. but a fair amount will line the pockets of the guys in charge. If I where to buy the album for a tenner how much would the band get? I don’t know, there’s probably plenty of blogs that do, but my point is that if I were to buy the album from the band for a tenner they would get a tenner. They could use it to cover things such as recording space and time (and the rest) and keep a nicer tider sum for themselves. To me that just makes more sense.

However one thing about this whole debacle is rather interesting. HMV sought help, through funding, from record labels and film studios who refused. For me this is a really odd choice, because surely this sets a precedent  that they won’t help companies that sell their product. What would the film industry do if2 cinemas start to collapse? Because they don’t make a great deal from DVD sales. Surely this is the clearest form of ‘biting the hand that feeds you’. Refusing to help a company that sells your product – it’s just odd. I really don’t know what this could mean. Could be nothing. Probably will be nothing.

One thing that is for sure is that retail is going online. There are hundreds and thousands of empty space on high streets that either aren’t being taken or are being converted to crappy £1 shops that have limited shelf life and are solely for a company to sell off its storage space3. I can only hope that these empty shells of buildings can be knocked down and replaced by nice things such as parks or libraries or museums. But then that’s probably another idea that makes too much sense and just not enough money.

Nick

  1. I know HMV will still be around for that but go with it []
  2. when []
  3. I really don’t understand where half the stuff comes from []
Share

Guest Authors – Chris – Out of Left Field 2

Out of left Field 2

Media

Where do we get our information? Increasingly people are turning their backs on the mainstream. Why? Several reasons but the main one is because they don’t believe they are receiving the truth. 24 hour coverage equates to 15 minute bulletins repeated all day and all night. The other reason is that the UK doesn’t have a free media as it is controlled by vested interest. Feed the electorate what you want them to know and they will vote how you want them to vote. This is the simple reason why there can’t be a European referendum or for that matter a referendum on anything, there just can’t be a balance debate, because the UK media has it stitched up. (e.g. PR voting) It then becomes important to look to other sources, internet, and foreign news channels. It’s good to find out what the rest of the world thinks about what’s going on. Two of the most refreshing commentators at present are; Jon Stewart on the Daily Show, on More Four (in a 2009 poll Stewart, a satirical comedian, was voted the most trusted man in the US) and Max Keiser on RTs Keiser report, Max is a breath of fresh air, hyperbole at its best. If you haven’t already, check them out.

Bankers

Why are people like the Greeks being blamed for this crisis? Didn’t the nations bail out the ‘too big to fail’ and now the nations are paying again and the ‘Banksters’ seem to have got away with it. Where are we going with the LIBOR debacle? The person in the street, with a loan or mortgage, does not seem to appreciate how much they have been taken for over the years. I have a couple of questions; firstly in respect of how much this continues to cost all of us how is it that it has so quickly disappeared from the news channels and newspapers? Secondly why is it that there have been no arrests? The population seem to think that it is important the Coalition bring about real changes to the financial markets but with 23 Millionaires in the Cabinet and a banker in Number 11, will it happen?

Debt and Sustainability

I would like for someone to tell me why it is that the people who didn’t cause the problem are being blamed and punished for it. For example public sector workers are asked to work longer, pay less and eventually get less from their pensions because we are told they cost us £5 billion a year when the bank/city bailout cost £1.35 trillion! The unemployed, homeless, disabled and foreigners have all been attacked. The media manipulates the truth to encourage reasonable people to resent the lazy and workshy. The balance sheet shows us that the entire unemployment and benefits budget of £86 billion is significantly less than the £100 billion stolen from the nation by the tax fraud, evasion and avoidance of the rich and business. We appear to have taken our eye of the ball. It is essential that ecological systems are repaired; environmental issues must be given greater importance. Most of us agree that installing solar-voltaic cells on the roof is an excellent, if for most of us expensive, home improvement. The Government subsidy was an essential and longsighted investment so it seems illogical to slash the subsidy just when it was beginning to impact positively on the development.

Stock Market

As I understand it the Stock market is a place where someone could take any spare cash they might have, obviously understanding the risks, invest in the world’s companies and expect some return. In turn a company could go to the Stock Market and in exchange for a ‘share’ of the company it would be able to raise capital to use to develop new products, goods and/or services. Obviously this isn’t what is going on. Even the Economist magazine, according to a recent article, doesn’t seem to believe the Stock Market is fit for purpose anymore. The way that the commodity markets are being misused is not just criminal but is immoral. Too many commodities, from energy like oil to food such as wheat are having their prices manipulated upwards to benefit only the speculators. Hard working families around the world are suffering while the top 1% benefit. Who will step in and correct this mass institutionalised theft? Another real concern is the use of computers taking over on the trading floor. 85% of all trades around the word are now thought to be controlled by artificial electronic brains. It might sound a little Sci-Fi but isn’t it wrong when the future welfare of over 7 billion people is at the whim of artificial intelligence?

Occupy

The Occupy movement was an example again of an effective media blackout following the initial frenzy of interest earlier in the year. In particular the camp outside St Paul’s in London threw up some interesting and important issues. The poster displayed that did find itself on the TV news around Easter, ‘what would Jesus Do?’ Well we know what Jesus did to the bankers in the New Testament temple; he threw over their money tables and chased them out. Wasn’t this the only recorded time the Son of God lost his temper?

Jubilee

This religious theme leads us nicely to another theme of 2012, the Jubilee. My reading of the Old Testament makes me think that Jubilee was set up as a time to cancel debts, every 7 years, indeed slaves were set free and society had a default setting to start again. Doesn’t Easter revolve around forgiveness and a fresh start? Generations ago people understood that the free market could not be left to run out of control, it is unsustainable. Bringing it up to date isn’t the Bible saying no one should be endlessly making vast profits from the rest of us. Other religions include similar teaching against ‘usury’.

Democracy

What do we think about a democracy with an unelected head of state and unelected second chamber of its parliament? The monarchy question is separate, but it is important that our democracy be brought up to date especially when we seem to like to lecture large parts of the world on the democratic process. The time is right to complete the task, electing only a proportion every 15 years is a very poor substitute and will only favour the ruling elite and vested interest, not the majority. Shouldn’t the second elected chamber have a strong, antagonistic impact on the first and be elected regularly on proportional grounds?

Hung Parliaments

It would have been a better option for the Liberal Democrats to allow the Tories to form a minority government in 2010, in this way the rest of the parties could have supported those measures that were seen to be in the national interest and voted down the machinations of the right that have caused so much damage to the economy, NHS and schools. It is obvious that the right have used this ‘financial crises’ to attack the welfare state and public sector in the mistaken belief that private is best. The speed at which they have done this has been breath taking although should surprise no one as they have been planning this for years and of course they are worried the Lib Dems will pull the plug at any time. I include the letter I wrote to 50 of the 57 Lib Dem MPs, I received 6 replies;
14th December 2010

I realise that you are not my MP but I believe I need to write this letter to you. Many people I know are concerned about the future of the Liberal Democrat Party. Serious errors of judgement have been made in supporting a Tory agenda which has more to do with right wing ideology than fair and effective government. It would have been better for everyone if the Tories had been allowed to form a minority government; they would have been enabled to show their true colours without the Liberal Democrats being so badly damaged.

It was very important to vote against a threefold increase in student fees but there are many other unfair and damaging measures. When will the people who got us into this financial situation begin to make remuneration? Why is your party not actively promoting the Robin Hood Tax? We are not all in it together when the distance between rich and poor continues to increase. Putting a stop to the tide of redundancies envisaged for 2011 would be a forward thinking policy. The debt the UK was left with in 1945 wasn’t fully paid back for 60 years, in fact only recently in the last few years; we should have a more sensible approach to this deficit. Liberal Democrat leaders seem to justify their support as being for the national good, you will be aware of a more cynical interpretation of your party’s lurch to the right and that is to attain 5 seats around the cabinet table.

People voted Liberal Democrat to keep the Tories out; the Liberal Democrats must remove themselves from this unwanted alliance if they wish to survive the next election and an excellent opportunity would be as a result of being undermined by their ‘partners’ over the PR referendum next May. Many friends tell me they don’t bother to vote because their vote doesn’t count. I am sure you have heard lots of people say the same; you know that change to the electoral system is essential. Whilst this change is due, it is far from guaranteed, ask yourself, is the devastation being caused by the Tory government a price worth paying?

Public Sector

We should not underestimate the effects of this Coalition and the responsibility of blame that sits at the feet of each member of the Lib Dem party as at conference their members seem impotent. The resultant mismanagement is legion; £22 billion has been saved from the RPI to CPI pension change alone, has it been recycled into the funds? no just into the treasury, GP’s are leaving the profession as a result of the NHS changes which is an horrendous loss of expertise to the nation, the police force is being decimated with officers being ‘forced’ to ‘retire’ rather than be made redundant, and the negative impact of the Secretary of State for education on schools has been devastating as he seeks to recreate the schools of his childhood. There is no evidence that Academies or Free Schools will improve education, there is evidence that it will have a negative impact on conditions for teachers. There is no evidence that scrapping the GCSE will increase standards but the removal and undermining of the position of Vocational Courses will disenfranchise and demotivate many students.

MAY 1979

The fateful decision was made on that day in early May 1979 and the UK electorate made the mistake of allowing the accountants to take over the running of the country. Venture Capitalists and an ever increasing drive to cut costs, which is a code for ‘remove workers’, and increase profits. But for who? Who has benefited from the privatisation of the utilities such as gas and water? Certainly not the customer. Who has benefited from the privatisation of British rail? Certainly not the commuter. Faceless Multinationals are making vast profits from what belonged to all of us but was taken. The insidious and dark side to this is that the nation is controlled not so much by a dictator but by a dictating idea, an idea that isn’t sustainable but is incredibly wasteful of resources and people. If you hear someone say that profit comes first before people then you are listening to an idiot. Of course another serious problem is that so many of us have bought into the lies and see nothing wrong with the system until the wheels come of our little corner of it. We were told ’there is no more society’ when our make-up is ‘no man is an island’.

Capitalism or Feudalism?

The right is championed by several groups, one of which is the Taxpayers Alliance; with all the tax avoidance that is going on do we think any of them pay tax and if they do what do they think about the tax money wasted by Coalition decisions? Cutting tax to the rich, ‘because it wasn’t raising much’ says the Chancellor, it doesn’t matter how many times they call black white – it still looks black. All of the money being pumped into the economy should increase wages, inflation and the value of holdings in a capitalist system, however if it is draining away into the pockets of a very few people then we are running a 13th Century system. Neo-feudalism is a system where politics, finance, commerce, technology and media come together to control the masses for the benefit of a powerful minority. At this time we risk falling into a new ‘Dark Ages’ where we can do little collectively as we pay for the excesses of the few. The effective mothballing of NASA is an obvious casualty in the US and the break-up and privatisation of the NHS in the UK. We also need to admit that many of us are engaged in activities that detract from important realities.

It is important that we all wake up to what is being done, done not even in our name as this regime has no electoral mandate. As a nation we need to wake up from the politically zombie like state that we have allowed the media to null us into. Our future is in our own hands, it is our future and we need to reclaim it and make it ours again.

Let me know what you think.

Share

Assassins Creed III Review

Being a fan of all things acrobaty, third person, combaty and different from your run-of-the-mill steroid junkie guys with big machine guns shouting ridiculous things1; I took instantly to the assassins creed games. The final game of the series came out on Wednesday and I’ve put in @!hd(f*&bt  hours of gameplay into it ever since.

Assassins Creed III is the fifth game of the series, that’s right, Ubisoft seem to take the same approach to numbering games as apple do to their iPhones. As like all games that have come beforehand, you play as Desmond and his team who are trying desperately to stop a company of Templar agents (yes, as in knights of the Templar) and prevent the end of the world on 21st December 2012 as predicted by the Mayans. To do this Desmond enters a virtual reality thing and is able to take the form of his ancestors who have hidden secrets in their history. First you were Altiar, who went round going all stabby stabby during the crusades. Next you were Ezio, a cross between Lara Croft and James Bond, screwing every woman that winked at him and destroying every temple or church in renaissance Italy. For this installment you live the life of Connor, an Anglo-Native American whose father had the same idea as Ezio and bagged himself the first native that caught his eye once he was off the boat.

The story is farfetched but then so is Inception and Star Wars and we all love them. The appeal of the games is that Desmond obviously shares a bloodline with Spiderman as you can climb St. Mark’s bell tower in Venice and the Coliseum in  Rome as if they were trees; and in Assassins Creed 3 you can climb trees!

That may have been a bit too cynical. What is great about the games is their twisting of historical events. As an assassin you have Templar agent targets that were real people in history. During Ezio’s life it was the Borgia family and whilst playing as Connor you are cooperating with and going up against some of the founding fathers of America.

This last game has caused a fair bit of controversy in the UK, mainly because you are working towards establishing the independence of America and that includes killing plenty of Brits. There were many complaints that in trailers for the game you were going around killing every British soldier that…well was a British soldier. The game makers stated that it wasn’t an anti-British game, and it isn’t, however they decided that the special edition of the game wasn’t to be sold in Europe although we’re only really missing out on a massive US flag. Oh no!

Rather than being anti-British the game takes an approach that blurs the lines of morality. In the games before the villains were so clear they may as well been twirling their moustaches and leaving damsels in distress on train lines. However in this game it appears that every target Connor assassinates in the early levels probably shouldn’t have been killed2 and they actually give you vital information that is taken on preparing for the next target. All the while Connor is searching for a way to get to the man that torched his village who is no more than Anglo-British General Charles Lee, who is supposed to be on the Americans’ side! Talk about being confused who the target is.

Although I would like to go on record that there should have been a COD style warning giving the option for players to miss the mission where you throw tea into Boston harbour. Even if you were trying to achieve the British dream of a sea entirely made of tea it would be too salty and too weak! You’d need at least a hundred more tea bags for that to work! The only consolation is that it wasn’t Yorkshire tea they were throwing in but NO, TEA IS TEA GODDAMNIT!!!

Whew, okay where was I?

In the previous game (Assassins Creed: Revelations) you were given a few extra tools and mini games but they all felt tired; mainly because you were playing as Ezio in his fifties. It just didn’t feel that a man of that age could leap around Constantinople with the ease he did. Plus, the mini-game you were given was a tower defence, much less endearing than you could find for free on the Internet. AC III just feels fresh; added to the jumping off big buildings are naval warfare missions and hunting challenges, such as trying to catch the Bigfoot. You could just be innocently wandering through the forest and all of a sudden a bear/wolf/cougar/elk will attack you and you have to be quick with the buttons to prevent being mauled to death. It’s a new challenge and it’s fun.

Another noticeable difference in this game is the brutality of the fighting. Connor has no trouble in burying his tomahawk into the back of a guard’s head or impaling him on his own bayonet. You also get to witness a trainee bury a carving knife into someone’s collarbone. It’s not just the sheer aggression when it comes to fighting guards but also their pursuit when things go tits up – and things will go tits up. The cities of New York and Boston are packed with blocks of narrow alleyways that are great for losing sight of the guards. However they open up into large wide boulevards that attract a LOT more so you really have to think about what route to take to evade them. It yet again makes you aware that you aren’t an invincible superhero but a highly skilled mercenary.

There are a few issues with glitches and occasionally climbing up or jumping off the wrong thing but these are minor. The guys at Ubisoft Montreal have taken a franchise that had started to dwindle and supercharged it to a final hurrah. Each level has the ability to pass or complete with 100% sync and boy those full syncs are much harder than in previous games. Combining this with the multiple side missions gives the game hours of gameplay once you’ve finished the story, and I’m pretty sure I’m nowhere near even after i3£€g*dn^# hours.

Overall the game oodles quality and I’ve not even approached the great performances of the voice actors. If you’ve never played the series before I’m not sure if this is the place to start, and if you don’t like this series then this is unlikely to persuade you. However if you’ve played the games before and enjoyed them then you will love this, there’s nothing else to say about it. In fact I’m so sure you’ll love this game that if you don’t, I’ll give you a full money back guarantee.3

Nick

  1. I’m looking at you gears of war []
  2. SPOILERS! []
  3. No I won’t []
Share